See all six industries

The tax on legal work

Two things eat a lawyer's week and neither one is law. The first is reading a contract twice to find the clause that moved since the last version. The second is reconstructing on Friday what was billable on Tuesday. Both are mechanical, both are expensive at an hourly rate, and both are the kind of work a machine handles well.

Reading contracts and finding precedent

The system compares an incoming draft against your own standard and marks what differs, with the risk stated in plain language. Research works the same way: a question goes in, and back comes a set of sources with the relevant passage quoted, so the check is reading rather than hunting. It draws on the firm's own bank of past work first, because that is where your positions already live.

Time capture and the file

Billable time gets reconstructed from the calendar, the email and the documents actually touched, then presented as a draft timesheet for approval. Documents filed by a paralegal or arriving from a client get tagged to the right matter on their own. By the time a meeting starts, the file is assembled.

Where we would start in your office

The first build is contract intake. Agreements arrive in every format including scanned and marked up by hand, and someone reads each one for the same handful of facts: the parties, the dates, the renewal terms, and the clauses that differ from your standard. High hours, describable rules, and every value checkable against the page it came from. Matter management and client reporting follow, because both depend on that contract data being current and neither is worth building on top of a file somebody still maintains by hand.

Questions we get asked

Is client confidentiality protected?

Yes, and it is the first thing we design around. Nothing goes to a public model endpoint that trains on inputs, deployment sits inside your environment or a private tenancy, and access is scoped per matter.

Can it be trusted to read a contract?

Treat it as a first pass. It reads faster than a person and catches the mechanical differences reliably, and the judgment about whether a changed clause matters stays with the lawyer.

Does it work on Hebrew legal documents?

Yes. Hebrew contracts, including scanned ones and ones carrying handwritten amendments, go through the same pipeline as English.

We are a small firm. Is this only for the big ones?

Small firms often get more out of it, because there is no back office absorbing the mechanical work. The build is sized to the practice.

Tell us what's slowing your business down.

30 minutes. No pitch, no deck. Just listening to your needs and seeing how we can help.

Schedule a discovery call

🍪 Cookie Time

We use cookies to make your experience smoother, faster, and a little more fun. If you stick around, we'll take that as a thumbs-up. Learn more